foreignpolicydigest.org

Latest Headlines

Home Opinion

OPINION

Fueled By Faith: Ending the Genocide in Darfur

E-mail Print PDF

Rev. Gloria White-Hammond, M.D.
Chairperson, Save Darfur Coalition

2009 marks the seventh year of the ongoing genocide in Darfur - seven years of constant killing, rape, destruction and displacement in Sudan – a nation at war with itself.  For the last month, activists, religious leaders and survivors of some of the world’s most horrific genocides have come together at events across the country for Genocide Prevention Month in order to advocate for a global effort to stop this, and future, atrocities.
 

For many of us involved with this effort, our dedication, resolve and belief in a light at the end of the tunnel, is fueled by our faith. Our confidence in the power of persistent faith is inspired by stories from our sacred texts and informed by accounts in our history books. 

The New Testament gospel writer, Luke, recounts the parable of the persistent widow who seeks justice from the unrighteous judge. She declares victory when the unrelenting tenacity of the grassroots activist eventually wears down the uncaring judge. The passage ends with a rhetorical question. If the reprobate judge eventually acquiesces and does the right thing, won't the God who is righteous and caring, respond to our advocacy by doing likewise?  

The Hebrew Bible is also replete with accounts of activists whose persevering faith led to justice despite oppressive leaders and overwhelming odds. What if Moses had abandoned hope in the face of the hard-hearted Pharaoh? What if Queen Esther, seized with fear, indecision or indifference, failed to petition the king—thereby enabling the extermination of her people?  

The power of activism energized by faith is also reflected in the subsequent success of contemporary social movements. The power of activism energized by faith is also reflected in the success of more contemporary social movements. Throughout their campaigns, persistent activists embodied the confidence that determined faith coupled with decisive action would tip the scales of justice in favor of the oppressed—sometimes quickly, but more often slowly, painfully slowly.  

Gandhi devoted thirty years to the arduous struggle for Indian independence. Throughout the years of arrests and imprisonments, he found inspiration in the Hindu Bhagavad-Gita for the movement that would eventually shake India and the British Empire. "When disappointment stares me in the face and all alone I see not one ray of light, I go back to the Bhagavad-Gita. I find a verse here and a verse there, and I immediately begin to smile in the midst of overwhelming tragedies."   

From the early days of the movement, Gandhi collaborated with Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, a devout Muslim who recruited over 100,000 nonviolent activists and armed them with “the weapon of the Prophet—patience and righteousness.”  

The same indefatigable faith sustained Nelson Mandela and his fellow freedom fighters through four decades of warfare against legalized racism before the walls of apartheid collapsed and came tumbling down.   

Such faith enabled civil rights workers in America to hold fast to the vision of the Hebrew prophet, Amos, for a day when "justice [would] roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream." Activists could hardly imagine the immense changes wrought in America because of their sacrifices—changes that resulted in the election of the first African American president fifty years later. 

Genocide Prevention Month and the coming together of this ‘constituency of conscience’ at events across the world are more relevant than ever before. Just a few weeks ago, I had the opportunity – along with several other Darfur advocacy leaders – to meet with President Obama and Special Envoy Scott Gration to share our insights on the region and provide recommendations on how to address the deteriorating humanitarian crisis. President Obama recognizes that those who are continuing to fight for Darfur are not defined by a single religion, community or calling. What unites these activists is the singular desire to stop genocide from occurring anywhere ever again.   

In the Jewish tradition, the seventh year is the year of jubilee when captives are set free and land is returned to its original owner. We are wise enough to know that the battle to end genocide follows no set timetable; but we are "faith-fueled" enough to believe that jubilee for Darfur and all victims of genocide is well on its way.  

 ---

Rev. Gloria White-Hammond, M.D.
Chairperson, Save Darfur Coalition

Dr. White-Hammond’s work as a humanitarian has achieved global impact. She has worked as a medical missionary in several African countries including Botswana, Cote D’Ivoire and South Africa. Since 2001 Dr. Gloria has made seven trips into war-torn southern Sudan where she has been involved in obtaining the freedom of 10,000 women and children who were enslaved during the two decades long civil war. In 2002 she co-founded My Sister’s Keeper (MSK), a humanitarian women’s group that partners with women of Sudan in their efforts toward reconciliation and reconstruction of their communities. MSK has developed two grinding mill projects and supports the Akon School for Girls in Gogrial County. In February 2005, Dr. White-Hammond traveled into Darfur, western Sudan to listen and learn from female victims of genocide in Internally Displaced Persons camps. She recently served as the National Chairperson of the Million Voices for Darfur campaign and currently is the Co-Chair of the Massachusetts Coalition to Save Darfur. She was awarded a Bachelor of Arts degree in biology from Boston University, a Doctorate of Medicine from Tufts Medical School and a Master of Divinity from Harvard Divinity School.

Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:06 )
 

Prioritize Interfaith Cooperation or Forfeit Religious Young People

E-mail Print PDF

Eboo Patel
Founder and Executive Director of Interfaith Youth Core

In an era of global religious conflict, three points are clear: Religion is not going away, it is impossible to avoid contact with people from different religions, and religious identity is profoundly important to young people. The predominant narrative about religion, born of Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations and Al-Qaeda, tells the story of inherent conflict. It presents a powerful way for youth to engage religious identity: Guarantee that your religion dominates and all others suffocate.

But religious identity in the 21st century can mean something different. The strength of a young person’s religious conviction does not have to be at the cost of someone else’s dignity. Young people have a choice: join the futile fight for destruction, or pave the way for cooperation. Choosing cooperation means joining the ranks of the most powerful social movements in history led by religious young people, such as Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. who, at 26, led the Montgomery Bus Boycott. As young people build the interfaith youth movement, they advance and expand a compelling counter to the narrative of religious violence.

The urgency of this situation is compounded by a series of converging sociopolitical and population trends which have created a mass of religious young people. These influential trends are probably not news to any of you. We know that globalization has given rise to unprecedented interaction among diverse religious communities around the world, and that it is young people, as they in particular have embraced new forms of global communication, who will decide how these interactions tend. In Muslim majority countries, several additional trends are at work. First, there is a significant youth bulge: in Afghanistan and the Gaza Strip, the median age is about 17 years; in Iraq and Pakistan it is barely 20, and in Syria and Saudi Arabia the median is about 21.5 years.[1] Second, these youth are faced with changing socio-economic factors that create insecurity; there is a clear lack of job opportunities and services to meet their needs. The unemployment rates in Afghanistan and the Gaza Strip have been estimated at close to 40%, and in Jordan and Iraq this number is around 30%.[2] Finally, as youth worldwide seek identity and purpose in their lives, they are confronted with a global religious revival. Scholar Thomas Farr writes “Faith, far from exiting the world’s stage, has played a growing role in human affairs, even as modernization has proceeded apace. Iran’s Shiite revolution in 1979, the Catholic Church’s role in the “third wave” of democratization, the 9/11 attacks – all illustrated just how important a global force religion has become.”[3]

Though much of the media focus is on the Middle East, the issue of religious identity in youth is relevant worldwide. Muslim communities in Western Europe are a key demographic that cannot be ignored. As of 2003, there were 15 million Muslims in the European Union (three times more than in the United States at the time). Moreover, in 2003 the Muslim birth rate in Europe was triple that of the non-Muslim birth rate. By 2015, the Muslim population in Europe will have doubled, while the non-Muslim population will have declined by 3.5%.[4] Many of these European young Muslims face issues such as discrimination, economic deprivation, underemployment, and residence in ghettoized communities.

Let me be clear: the problem is not the mass of religious young people. The problem is that powerful grassroots movements like Al-Qaeda engage young people’s religious identities destructively and lead them towards radicalization. These movements provide youth with uncertain futures a sense purpose, meaning and contribution. We need a substantial investment in a counter-movement that engages the powerful force of religious identity in a constructive way. This movement will provide youth with a different kind of meaning: empowering them to become interfaith leaders. It will require significant funding, the mobilization of human capital and the adoption of interfaith youth engagement as a government priority.

With the Obama administration, this counter-movement could become a reality. Since day one at his inaugural address, Obama has emphasized the importance of interfaith engagement and cooperation. Last week in Turkey, he made it clear that “The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam.” His outreach to the Muslim world, indicated by his re-iterated “open hand” to Iran and recent visit to Turkey and Iraq, among other examples, shows that his intention isn’t merely rhetorical. The White House Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, of which I am an advisory member, is another example: one of our four task forces focuses on interfaith cooperation.

As the most powerful leader in the world, it means something that President Obama has chosen to highlight this issue. I hope he considers the pivotal role of young interfaith leaders in his quest to advance interfaith cooperation.

---

Eboo Patel

Eboo Patel is the founder and Executive Director of the Interfaith Youth Core, a Chicago-based institution building the global interfaith youth movement. He was recently appointed by President Obama to the Advisory Council of the White House Office of Faith Based and Neighborhood Initiatives, where he is working to realize the President’s priority of interfaith cooperation. He is the author of Acts of Faith: The Story of an American Muslim, the Struggle for the Soul of a Generation. Eboo holds a doctorate in the sociology of religion from Oxford University, where he studied on a Rhodes scholarship. He writes "The Faith Divide", a featured blog on religion for The Washington Post and has also written for the Harvard Divinity School Bulletin, the Chicago Tribune, The Clinton Journal, The Review of Faith and International Affairs, The Sunday Times of India and National Public Radio. Eboo serves on the Religious Advisory Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Committee of the Aga Khan Foundation USA, and the National Board of the YMCA. He has spoken at the TED Conference, the Clinton Global Initiative, the Nobel Peace Prize Forum and at universities around the world. Eboo is an Ashoka Fellow, part of a select group of social entrepreneurs whose ideas are changing the world; was named by Islamica Magazine as one of ten young Muslim visionaries shaping Islam in America; was chosen by Harvard’s Kennedy School Review as one of five future policy leaders to watch; and was most recently selected to join the Young Global Leaders network of the World Economic Forum.

Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:05 )
 

Even if we die trying

E-mail Print PDF

You have probably heard it before. The world is doomed unless we act now to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change, most notably CO2. But what if we actually do act now? Is it simply too late? Directly from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in their very cautious language, “there is high agreement and much evidence that with current climate change mitigation policies and related sustainable development practices, global GHG emissions will continue to grow over the next few decades.” According to James Lovelock, originator of the Gaia theory in which the Earth is described as a self-regulating planet, it is hopeless to reduce carbon emissions. Even though the end result of climate change may be a significant reduction in the number of people on Earth, according to Lovelock, 9 billion people on Earth is not necessarily better than 1 billion people. Perhaps a valid point.

 

Most people who are knowledgeable and well informed on the subject of greenhouse gases agree that climate change is anthropogenic, mostly caused by economically (over)developed counties, and the impacts will most acutely affect the global poor. As Wangari Maathai, environmentalist and Nobel Peace Prize winner stated, Africans, more than any other people, will be hit very hard by the impacts of climate change. These impacts, already unfolding, are troublesome: increased water stress, extinctions, negative impacts on subsistence farmers, loss of global coastal wetlands, increased morbidity and mortality from heat waves, floods and droughts, increased burden from malnutrition, diarrhoeal, cardio-respiratory, and infectious diseases, and more.

 

The bad news: there is no silver bullet or breakthrough technology (yet) that will get us out of the disarray in which we find ourselves. We currently have no solution that is 100% sustainable, that is to say, completely socially and environmentally responsible as well as economically feasible. The only thing that we can do now is prioritize our actions in light of this enormous challenge. What negative consequences of a solution are we willing to accept and continually work on reducing? What impacts on the environment and society are simply out of the question? We may agree on a certain energy mix (many different kinds of energy for the world, as opposed to the current domination of a few power sources), but what percentages go where? When they are at odds, which is more important, climate change or energy independence?

 

More bad news: all of this depends on value judgements. Of course, we all do not share the same values. We even have difficulty effectively communicating because of language barriers. The future of climate change, human at its roots and human at its challenge, will depend on various cultural and moral judgements that we have not been able to agree upon before.

 

Again more bad news: nothing is completely carbon-free. Carbon is emitted to make, transport, and/or transmit various types of renewable energy sources: a wind turbine, a solar panel, biofuels, geothermal energy, hydro schemes, biomass, etc. And, probably one of the most under-asked questions is, what are we going to do about transportation? Some answers: paddle boats, electric cars, biodiesel, trains, natural gas buses, good old-fashioned gasoline in a tiny two-seater, bicycles, double-decker airplanes, hot air balloons…maybe even, walking. So far, no answer.

 

What about nuclear energy? Low-carbon—check. Proven technology—check. Safe—check (as Lovelock stated, nuclear energy from its start in 1952 has proven to be the safest of all energy sources). Capability to provide reliable and efficient energy—five stars. Capability to provide worldwide employment (let’s not forget the first P in people, planet, profit)—five stars. Generates lots of waste and radioactivity—not necessarily. Ever heard of the 3Rs—reduce, reuse, recycle? (For those that can’t stand the use of two clichés—the 3Ps and 3Rs in the same paragraph, please bear with me). When recycling is employed in the nuclear energy cycle, the volume of final “waste” and the radioactivity of the waste are significantly reduced. So by creating a closed cycle, recycling the spent fuel, we make life better for you and me and future generations.

 

Is there good, better, and best news? Well, there is a large and growing passionate group of (especially young) people out there ready to solve the climate crisis. In addition to the immense policy changes and engineering innovations needed, everyone can do her/his part each day. Here are some examples. Where possible, use your 100 watt bio energy as a human being to walk where you need to go (and if it is difficult to walk in your community, pressure your politicians to make your living area pedestrian-friendly), choose a less energy intensive diet, turn your computer all the way off when it is not in use, go ahead and change all of your light bulbs to energy efficient ones, seek information about the embodied energy and carbon footprint of the materials you own and purchase and be careful to consider other important factors of sustainability—like the social impact of your purchases, and finally, perhaps consider moving to a higher altitude if you live near the coast…

 

As stated by the IPCC, sustainable development can reduce vulnerability to climate change, and climate change could hinder nations’ abilities to follow the course of sustainable development. Sustainable development and climate change are thus intricately linked; many of our efforts in various domains (health care, employment, biodiversity conservation, etc.), will be severely compromised by climate change. So while it may be simply too late (or maybe not), we should act now to solve the climate challenge…or die trying.

 

--

Marilyn Waite has a BSE in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Princeton University. She has worked and lived in many countries including those in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. She received an MPhil in Engineering for Sustainable Development at Cambridge University and currently works in the energy industry in France.
Last Updated ( Friday, 27 March 2009 22:47 )
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »