| Change in Cuba? |
|
| March 2008 - Americas | ||||||
| Written by Christian Gomez Jr. | ||||||
|
BACKGROUND The Platt Amendment of 1901 laid the framework for U.S.-Cuba relations for the next three decades. The amendment's provisions -- which established a U.S. naval base in Cuba and maintained that the US could intervene in Cuban affairs if it deemed necessary, among others -- were built into the Cuban Constitution of 1901. All provisions, except the base at Guantanamo Bay, were repealed in 1934.
The emergence of strongman Fulgencio Batista as leader of the Cuban army and later president for 11 years (1940-1944, 1952-1959), was a time of close cooperation between the U.S. and Cuba. Unfortunately, the Batista years were characterized by high levels of corruption which, along with the significant U.S. influence in Cuban affairs, galvanized a group of 165 young Cubans who unsuccessfully stormed the Moncada barracks in Santiago de Cuba on July 26, 1953.
The 26th of July Movement was thus born, featuring Fidel Castro as its charismatic leader. His brother Raúl was already second in command; the Argentinean physician Ernesto "Che" Guevara would later join the movement. After being jailed and exiled to México, Fidel consolidated his guerilla army and began a nearly three year insurgency that culminated on January 1, 1959 with the guerilla army's victorious entry into Havana. The Cuban Revolution was triumphant.
While Fidel's government was initially recognized by President Dwight Eisenhower, Cuba's relations with the U.S. deteriorated when foreign properties were nationalized in the summer of 1960. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, passed during the Kennedy administration, established a "total embargo on all trade" to Cuba, which essentially remains in place today. The failed Bay of Pigs invasion by a group of Cuban exiles in 1961 and the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 further exacerbated strained relations and thrust Cuba into a strategically important Cold War position due to its alignment with the Soviet Union and proximity to the U.S.
Throughout the Cold War, the Cuban economy was propped up by the USSR, while Cuban military and intelligence operatives expanded their revolutionary aims to developing countries such as Angola, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, Grenada, and Yemen. When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, Cuba entered what became known as the "Special Period," an economic depression that forced Fidel to implement limited economic reforms, including allowing some private shops and services to emerge. At the time, the USSR accounted for about 80% of trade with Cuba.
Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, elected in 1999, has arguably replaced the USSR as Cuba's main benefactor. Chávez provides 100,000 barrels of oil per day at cut rate prices, and Cuba has in turn regularly sent teams of highly trained doctors to Venezuela to work in Chávez's social missions.
ANALYSIS When Fidel handed power over to Raúl in July 2006, he relinquished his role as head of state and government but remains leader of the Communist party and a member of the National Assembly. While he has not made a single public appearance since, he has remained an unmistakable presence on the island, writing dozens of "Reflections" in the pages of Granma and meeting privately with leaders such as Chávez and Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Raúl, who has been commander-in-chief of the army since the Revolution, is seen as more pragmatic, less ideological, and certainly less charismatic than Fidel. In July of last year, he called for a national debate on the country's problems in his state of the union address. Reforms in areas such as agriculture, oil, nickel mining, and sugar cane ethanol are sorely needed to increase citizen incomes, but it is unclear whether Raúl will meet heightened expectations. Indeed, the naming of the 77 year-old Machado Ventura as Raúl's second in command, instead one of the younger Communist leaders, represents a distinct reinforcement of the status quo.
In terms of U.S. policy, changes could be on the horizon. Of the three main presidential candidates, Sen. Barack Obama's policy stance is the most progressive. He has said he would meet without preconditions with Raúl, and has called for travel and remittances restrictions to be lifted. Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain largely support the status quo, with the former advocating "full diplomatic engagement." Perhaps more interestingly, three Cuban-American members of Congress from Florida--all Republicans--face difficult re-election battles this fall, with two being challenged by Cuban-American Democrats.
In 2007, a poll conducted by Florida International University found that 65 % of Cuban Americans would support dialogue with the regime, up from 55 % in 2004. For decades, U.S.-Cuba policy has been dictated by domestic electoral concerns, yet a gradual shift of opinion in southern Florida might tilt U.S. policy towards a more sensible path. However, after nearly 50 years of an embargo that has failed to bring down the Castro regime, would Cuba welcome engagement from the U.S.? --
Christian Gomez, Jr. is program assistant for democratic governance at the Inter-American Dialogue, the leading U.S. center for policy analysis, exchange, and communication on issues in Western Hemisphere affairs. He previously served as Executive Director of Princeton in Latin America (PiLA) and was a PiLA Fellow at the Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress in San José, Costa Rica. He earned an AB with honors in Politics, with certificates in Latin American Studies and Political Economy, from Princeton University.
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.25
3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||